We imagine that the world
is at war across many battlefronts: Muslims vs. Christians, blacks vs. whites, rich
vs. poor, Hispanics vs. Anglo Americans, cops vs. civilians of color. But wait!
Not all Muslims are terrorists; not all blacks are criminals; not all poor
people are lazy thieves; not all Hispanics are drug smuggling rapists; not all
white people are racist killers. Not by a long shot.
The real war is between
the sociopaths and the compassionate. We can define sociopaths (or psychopaths,
depending on whom you read) as those who choose to hurt others for reasons of
their own satisfaction without remorse. Some will step on the fingers—or bodies—of others to
climb the ladder of success. Some will commit hate crimes.
Any introductory course
in economics will explain how the circulation of a dollar creates many times
the value of that dollar. The rich person who squirrels away a
billion dollars, taking it out of the reach of the economy, is injuring the
economy, a sociopathic act. The poor person who decides to improve his economic
standing by committing armed robbery is a sociopath. The cop who shoots a black
driver because she doesn't like his attitude and the black sniper who targets
white policemen (or anyone) are sociopaths. The Muslim mass-murderer is a
sociopath.
Martha Stout, Harvard
psychologist, claims that one in 25 of us is a sociopath. Others say one in 20.
More important than the exact ratio is the fact that there is a ratio. This ratio crosses all races, all nations, all
religions, all economic classes—in short, all accidents of birth.
Once life choices are
made however, we might expect to see higher concentrations of the remorseless
in certain careers and social groups. Politicians often seem to put personal
gain above conscience, as do the super-rich. Perhaps the police force attracts
more than its share of sociopaths. Some experts say the media does.
But consider this: The
ratio of one in twenty-five means that twenty-four out of twenty-five in any
population is not a sociopath. Twenty-four
out of twenty-five Muslims are not sociopaths. They might hate the European
Crusader, but they are not murderers. Surely every African American is
justifiably distraught over police shootings of blacks. Some may be angry over every shooting, even justifiable
shootings. They may fear, dislike, even hate police; but twenty-four out of twenty-five
do not resort to harming or killing others as a remedy. Some raise their voices;
some protest in the street, some fume at home; but conscience stays their
hands. Cops may be frustrated by crime. Many may be prejudiced, even racist.
But to the majority, hurting innocent people is an inconceivable response.
On a hectic freeway it
may seem that the majority of drivers are out to get each other—but count! For
every jerk that weaves through traffic and endangers others you will see twenty
to twenty-five well behaved drivers.
For the first five years
of my teaching career I worked in a most unruly environment. Our junior high
school was on a corner, and on each of the other three corners of the
intersection was a housing project. I broke up a fight every week. The
classroom was loud, and none of the classroom management strategies offered by
the pundits made a difference. Sometimes it was overwhelming, but at those
times I stopped and stood still. I looked at each student in turn, searching
for the well-behaved, and I found a lot. Just one or two youngsters were
whipping up the rest of the class to bedlam. I began calmly thanking each well
behaved student, and gradually the classroom settled down and isolated the troublemakers.
It is also essential that
we distinguish the instigators from the followers. The followers may be the
True Believers described decades ago by Eric Hoffer, but we need to identify
and defeat the aggressors who choose to advance their cause by harming others.
To defeat them we do not set out to kill or injure innocents: that is their way. Pitting one sociopath against
another does not defeat either one, but validates and strengthens both. A sociopath
does not mourn another sociopath. We will never “save” a sociopath, but must
struggle instead to win the hearts of the non-aggressive majority of the
population.
At the other end of the empathy-spectrum
there exist the compassionate, another minority. Between the two minorities
lies a wide no-man's land of people who can be persuaded to action in either
direction, depending on the skill of the recruiter. Not bad guys, not good guys, just guys.
The weapons of the conscience-free
are fear, deceit, hate, and violence. The tools of the compassionate, if they
are to remain compassionate, are wisdom, love, understanding, and nurture. This
is the most important thing I have to say, all else is just a careful
definition of terms. It is important because while the sociopaths are
waging a very successful campaign, too many of the compassionate are doing
little more than wringing their hands—and it is time to engage.
We stand by and allow the
middle population to wrestle the evil-doers to the ground and lock them up—a
necessary evil—but we must be much more active and much more creative. It's
hard for some whites in the middle population to let stand unedited the
sentiment “Black lives matter.” But if we are compassionate, why can't we say,
“Yes, black lives do matter”? This is
not the occasion for touting that white lives or blue lives or all lives
matter. Of course they do, but is that the thing to say to a wounded person?
Let’s find ways to commit
kindness—not just to random individuals, but to the groups that appear to
oppose us. Let’s find the loving hearts of all people, and recognize them.
Surely there are tens of thousands of creative people who can conceive of kind
ways to win over those who are as yet uncommitted to either violence or
kindness.
The compassionate rich
will find ways to re-insert their wealth into circulation in a more creative
way than to simply give enough to charity in order to catch a tax break.
I have yet to hear a
public official openly thank a peaceful demonstration for restraint and good
behavior. Sometimes, when a tragedy occurs, good behavior will be mentioned,
but I am talking about thanking demonstrators for no reason other than that
they deserve thanks. If I am mistaken and peaceful demonstrators have received
thanks, it has not been loud enough or perhaps the media have chosen not to
report it. Why not take out large print ads or make public service
announcements of thanks in the media? Or if officialdom will not, why not the clergy, or
a true philanthropist, or you and I?
The important task is to
recognize and reward nonviolent and compassionate behavior, especially among
our opponents. The immediacy and wide reach of information provided by
technology makes it possible for us for the first time in history to recognize
that we—all of us in every segment of the population and every contentious
group—all of us have a common enemy and a common, but unexpected, solution.
And perhaps an evolved
person or group of people could work to motivate other evolved and empathetic
people.
This is my first step.
No comments:
Post a Comment