Here is a little photo essay presenting my daughter Angela and me.
It is important in a photograph to depict something about the deeper
feelings of the subject. Here you can see that Angela and I are serious
contemplators of Universal Truth.
But it is important also to be lighthearted. In this next photo Angela
smiles to think of our fortunate position at the intersection of quantum
inspired multi-verses.
Angela says, “C’mon Dad, look into the many versions of your future. Look
deep, deep.”
“Yeah, Dad,” she says. “Work it!”
We showed these to my wife Ann, Angela’s mom, and she said that they were
not appropriate for this blog. I am very grateful for that comment, because it
gives me the perfect excuse to say:
Yes they are!
If this blog is going to be authentic, it must treat of more than
philosophical ruminations, more than the thought behind the production of art, more
than all that high falutin’ serious stuff. This blog is a bit of my art, a
performance piece if you will.
To exemplify its own theme, this blog must include what is real to this
consciousness—even emotion, as in the post “Betrayal;” or silliness; or odd
subjects that don’t seem to belong. If it is perceptible to this witness, it
belongs.
This post is another example of the self-reflective, thanks to Ann’s
remark and my opportunity to respond. And this paragraph is self-reflective on
its self-reflection. As such, it epitomizes the very ascending spiral of
self-awareness that I have been saying underlies everything meaningful that I
do.
A computer could not do this and mean it. If a computer could do this, still it could not talk
about being able to do this. Or else
about doing that which just preceded this sentence.
A human composed this essay. And, though these words are pretty good
evidence that a self-aware creature is experiencing himself in their
production, there can be no proof for the reader. A computer can be programmed to mimic
anything. A person, not self-aware, can say anything she is taught to say. But
there is no need to present proof. I am observing the proof. I am the proof.
As such, I am inaccessible to you, who are your own proof, because just
now you remembered to be self-aware.
Angela asks, “Are you going to tell what really happened when we took
those pictures?’
No.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWell, ok... I posted a comment, and it showed up twice. So I tried to delete the double posting and it removed both. I don't know what just happened. I asked, "Is this why capcha makes me prove I'm not a robot every single time I comment no matter how many times I have commented before?" Let's hope this comment only shows up once.
ReplyDeleteYou should prove that your proof wasn't made by a robot.
Delete